Review



corrected akaike information criterion (aicc)  (Esri inc)

 
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
    • 90
      Buy from Supplier

    Structured Review

    Esri inc corrected akaike information criterion (aicc)
    Corrected Akaike Information Criterion (Aicc), supplied by Esri inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/akaike+information+criterion+(aicc/corrected+akaike+information+criterion++aicc+/10__1016_slash_j__jort__2022__100558-50-6-31
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    corrected akaike information criterion (aicc) - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
    90/100 stars

    Images

    Related Articles

    other:

    Article Title: Research note: Spatial variations of condition class in Clifty Wilderness, Daniel Boone National Forest, KY, USA
    Article Snippet: The purpose of this study was to explore spatially heterogeneous relationships between campsite condition class and its associated variables in Clifty Wilderness, Daniel Boone National Forest, KY, USA.. To account for local dynamics, we used a geographically weighted regression (GWR) model, which has rarely been applied in previous recreation resource monitoring research.. The GWR model effectively visualized local variations in modeling the campsite condition class, with improvements in model performance over the corresponding ordinary least squares model.

    Article Title: Modelling youth pregnancy in continental Portugal through geographically weighted regression.
    Article Snippet: As the points of the municipalities were not regularly clustered, an adaptive kernel using a near-Gaussian weighting function was selected based on the corrected Akaike Information Criterion (AICc) (Akaike, 1974; ESRI, 2017).



    Similar Products

    corrected akaike information criterion (aicc)  (Esri inc)
    90
    Esri inc corrected akaike information criterion (aicc)
    Corrected Akaike Information Criterion (Aicc), supplied by Esri inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/akaike+information+criterion+(aicc/corrected+akaike+information+criterion++aicc+/10__1016_slash_j__jort__2022__100558-50-6-31
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    corrected akaike information criterion (aicc) - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
    90/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    akaike information criterion (aicc)  (CH Instruments)
    90
    CH Instruments akaike information criterion (aicc)
    Akaike Information Criterion (Aicc), supplied by CH Instruments, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/akaike+information+criterion+(aicc/akaike+information+criterion++aic+/10__1111_slash_aje__13029-105-11-17
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    akaike information criterion (aicc) - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
    90/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    bias-corrected akaike information criterion (aicc)  (GraphPad Software Inc)
    90
    GraphPad Software Inc bias-corrected akaike information criterion (aicc)
    Bias Corrected Akaike Information Criterion (Aicc), supplied by GraphPad Software Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/akaike+information+criterion+(aicc/akaike%E2%80%99s+information+criterion++aicc++test/pmc08600535-363-35-44
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    bias-corrected akaike information criterion (aicc) - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
    90/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    akaike’s information criterion (aicc) test  (GraphPad Software Inc)
    90
    GraphPad Software Inc akaike’s information criterion (aicc) test
    Comparison of hBMSC-Luc/GFP persistence in the femurs of mice with and without 2 Gy sub-lethal irradiation prior to transplant. a Representative IVIS images of the bioluminescence signal from mice that had either been non-irradiated or had been conditioned with 2 Gy irradiation. b Graphical display of the bioluminescence data for each animal across the 4-week study. Horizontal bar represents the group average. Linear regression curves were fitted to each data set. The signal in non-irradiated mice was significantly lower than in irradiated animals from week 2 to week 4 (2-way ANOVA with multiple comparison using Holm-Sidak correction). Significance between groups marked with asterisk; ** p ≤ 0.01, *** p ≤ 0.001. Data represents pooled data the two donor hBSMC and each with a biological repeat (total group n = 16 mice not irradiated, and n = 20 mice received 2 Gy irradiation). Donors are plotted separately in Supplementary Figure A. The graphical display in Supplementary Figure B shows the data fit by independent regression lines for irradiated and non-irradiated mice. <t>Akaike’s</t> Information Criterion (AICc) test in GraphPad was used to estimate the probability (99.92%) that the irradiated and non-irradiated mouse data was better fit by two independent curves, than a single curve, suggesting that BMSC behavior was statistically different in irradiated and non-irradiated mice
    Akaike’s Information Criterion (Aicc) Test, supplied by GraphPad Software Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/akaike+information+criterion+(aicc/akaike%E2%80%99s+information+criterion++aicc++test/pmc08042930-131-0-6
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    akaike’s information criterion (aicc) test - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
    90/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    akaike information criterion corrected for small sample size (aicc)  (GraphPad Software Inc)
    90
    GraphPad Software Inc akaike information criterion corrected for small sample size (aicc)
    Comparison of hBMSC-Luc/GFP persistence in the femurs of mice with and without 2 Gy sub-lethal irradiation prior to transplant. a Representative IVIS images of the bioluminescence signal from mice that had either been non-irradiated or had been conditioned with 2 Gy irradiation. b Graphical display of the bioluminescence data for each animal across the 4-week study. Horizontal bar represents the group average. Linear regression curves were fitted to each data set. The signal in non-irradiated mice was significantly lower than in irradiated animals from week 2 to week 4 (2-way ANOVA with multiple comparison using Holm-Sidak correction). Significance between groups marked with asterisk; ** p ≤ 0.01, *** p ≤ 0.001. Data represents pooled data the two donor hBSMC and each with a biological repeat (total group n = 16 mice not irradiated, and n = 20 mice received 2 Gy irradiation). Donors are plotted separately in Supplementary Figure A. The graphical display in Supplementary Figure B shows the data fit by independent regression lines for irradiated and non-irradiated mice. <t>Akaike’s</t> Information Criterion (AICc) test in GraphPad was used to estimate the probability (99.92%) that the irradiated and non-irradiated mouse data was better fit by two independent curves, than a single curve, suggesting that BMSC behavior was statistically different in irradiated and non-irradiated mice
    Akaike Information Criterion Corrected For Small Sample Size (Aicc), supplied by GraphPad Software Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/akaike+information+criterion+(aicc/akaike%E2%80%99s+information+criterion++aicc++test/pm31837280-128-16-21
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    akaike information criterion corrected for small sample size (aicc) - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
    90/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    akaike information criterion (aicc  (Esri inc)
    90
    Esri inc akaike information criterion (aicc
    Comparison of hBMSC-Luc/GFP persistence in the femurs of mice with and without 2 Gy sub-lethal irradiation prior to transplant. a Representative IVIS images of the bioluminescence signal from mice that had either been non-irradiated or had been conditioned with 2 Gy irradiation. b Graphical display of the bioluminescence data for each animal across the 4-week study. Horizontal bar represents the group average. Linear regression curves were fitted to each data set. The signal in non-irradiated mice was significantly lower than in irradiated animals from week 2 to week 4 (2-way ANOVA with multiple comparison using Holm-Sidak correction). Significance between groups marked with asterisk; ** p ≤ 0.01, *** p ≤ 0.001. Data represents pooled data the two donor hBSMC and each with a biological repeat (total group n = 16 mice not irradiated, and n = 20 mice received 2 Gy irradiation). Donors are plotted separately in Supplementary Figure A. The graphical display in Supplementary Figure B shows the data fit by independent regression lines for irradiated and non-irradiated mice. <t>Akaike’s</t> Information Criterion (AICc) test in GraphPad was used to estimate the probability (99.92%) that the irradiated and non-irradiated mouse data was better fit by two independent curves, than a single curve, suggesting that BMSC behavior was statistically different in irradiated and non-irradiated mice
    Akaike Information Criterion (Aicc, supplied by Esri inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/akaike+information+criterion+(aicc/arcgis+10+2/pm31099523-109-24-30
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    akaike information criterion (aicc - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
    90/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    akaike information criterion (aicc)  (SAS institute)
    90
    SAS institute akaike information criterion (aicc)
    Comparison of hBMSC-Luc/GFP persistence in the femurs of mice with and without 2 Gy sub-lethal irradiation prior to transplant. a Representative IVIS images of the bioluminescence signal from mice that had either been non-irradiated or had been conditioned with 2 Gy irradiation. b Graphical display of the bioluminescence data for each animal across the 4-week study. Horizontal bar represents the group average. Linear regression curves were fitted to each data set. The signal in non-irradiated mice was significantly lower than in irradiated animals from week 2 to week 4 (2-way ANOVA with multiple comparison using Holm-Sidak correction). Significance between groups marked with asterisk; ** p ≤ 0.01, *** p ≤ 0.001. Data represents pooled data the two donor hBSMC and each with a biological repeat (total group n = 16 mice not irradiated, and n = 20 mice received 2 Gy irradiation). Donors are plotted separately in Supplementary Figure A. The graphical display in Supplementary Figure B shows the data fit by independent regression lines for irradiated and non-irradiated mice. <t>Akaike’s</t> Information Criterion (AICc) test in GraphPad was used to estimate the probability (99.92%) that the irradiated and non-irradiated mouse data was better fit by two independent curves, than a single curve, suggesting that BMSC behavior was statistically different in irradiated and non-irradiated mice
    Akaike Information Criterion (Aicc), supplied by SAS institute, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/akaike+information+criterion+(aicc/akaike+information+criterion++aic++values/10__1016_slash_j__fbp__2018__10__007-159-36-43
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    akaike information criterion (aicc) - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
    90/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    akaike information criterion (aicc)  (Biotechnology Information)
    90
    Biotechnology Information akaike information criterion (aicc)
    Comparison of hBMSC-Luc/GFP persistence in the femurs of mice with and without 2 Gy sub-lethal irradiation prior to transplant. a Representative IVIS images of the bioluminescence signal from mice that had either been non-irradiated or had been conditioned with 2 Gy irradiation. b Graphical display of the bioluminescence data for each animal across the 4-week study. Horizontal bar represents the group average. Linear regression curves were fitted to each data set. The signal in non-irradiated mice was significantly lower than in irradiated animals from week 2 to week 4 (2-way ANOVA with multiple comparison using Holm-Sidak correction). Significance between groups marked with asterisk; ** p ≤ 0.01, *** p ≤ 0.001. Data represents pooled data the two donor hBSMC and each with a biological repeat (total group n = 16 mice not irradiated, and n = 20 mice received 2 Gy irradiation). Donors are plotted separately in Supplementary Figure A. The graphical display in Supplementary Figure B shows the data fit by independent regression lines for irradiated and non-irradiated mice. <t>Akaike’s</t> Information Criterion (AICc) test in GraphPad was used to estimate the probability (99.92%) that the irradiated and non-irradiated mouse data was better fit by two independent curves, than a single curve, suggesting that BMSC behavior was statistically different in irradiated and non-irradiated mice
    Akaike Information Criterion (Aicc), supplied by Biotechnology Information, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/akaike+information+criterion+(aicc/akaike+information+criterion++aicc+/pm27060424-36-10-50
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    akaike information criterion (aicc) - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
    90/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    Comparison of hBMSC-Luc/GFP persistence in the femurs of mice with and without 2 Gy sub-lethal irradiation prior to transplant. a Representative IVIS images of the bioluminescence signal from mice that had either been non-irradiated or had been conditioned with 2 Gy irradiation. b Graphical display of the bioluminescence data for each animal across the 4-week study. Horizontal bar represents the group average. Linear regression curves were fitted to each data set. The signal in non-irradiated mice was significantly lower than in irradiated animals from week 2 to week 4 (2-way ANOVA with multiple comparison using Holm-Sidak correction). Significance between groups marked with asterisk; ** p ≤ 0.01, *** p ≤ 0.001. Data represents pooled data the two donor hBSMC and each with a biological repeat (total group n = 16 mice not irradiated, and n = 20 mice received 2 Gy irradiation). Donors are plotted separately in Supplementary Figure A. The graphical display in Supplementary Figure B shows the data fit by independent regression lines for irradiated and non-irradiated mice. Akaike’s Information Criterion (AICc) test in GraphPad was used to estimate the probability (99.92%) that the irradiated and non-irradiated mouse data was better fit by two independent curves, than a single curve, suggesting that BMSC behavior was statistically different in irradiated and non-irradiated mice

    Journal: Stem Cell Research & Therapy

    Article Title: Human bone marrow-derived stromal cell behavior when injected directly into the bone marrow of NOD- scid -gamma mice pre-conditioned with sub-lethal irradiation

    doi: 10.1186/s13287-021-02297-7

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Comparison of hBMSC-Luc/GFP persistence in the femurs of mice with and without 2 Gy sub-lethal irradiation prior to transplant. a Representative IVIS images of the bioluminescence signal from mice that had either been non-irradiated or had been conditioned with 2 Gy irradiation. b Graphical display of the bioluminescence data for each animal across the 4-week study. Horizontal bar represents the group average. Linear regression curves were fitted to each data set. The signal in non-irradiated mice was significantly lower than in irradiated animals from week 2 to week 4 (2-way ANOVA with multiple comparison using Holm-Sidak correction). Significance between groups marked with asterisk; ** p ≤ 0.01, *** p ≤ 0.001. Data represents pooled data the two donor hBSMC and each with a biological repeat (total group n = 16 mice not irradiated, and n = 20 mice received 2 Gy irradiation). Donors are plotted separately in Supplementary Figure A. The graphical display in Supplementary Figure B shows the data fit by independent regression lines for irradiated and non-irradiated mice. Akaike’s Information Criterion (AICc) test in GraphPad was used to estimate the probability (99.92%) that the irradiated and non-irradiated mouse data was better fit by two independent curves, than a single curve, suggesting that BMSC behavior was statistically different in irradiated and non-irradiated mice

    Article Snippet: Akaike’s Information Criterion (AICc) test in GraphPad was used to estimate the probability (99.92%) that the irradiated and non-irradiated mouse data was better fit by two independent curves, than a single curve, suggesting that BMSC behavior was statistically different in irradiated and non-irradiated mice

    Techniques: Comparison, Irradiation